- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
MASTIO: Big win, small opportunity
GOP still needs to win trust of voters for big change
Question of the Day
Republicans may have won big last night, but before they do anything with their newfound clout, they should start thinking small. That’s exactly the opposite of what the permanent Washington establishment - including many of the GOP’s own leaders - will start whispering in their ears once that wave of new congressmen and senators crosses the Potomac.
You can hear it already from The Washington Post’s Slate magazine: “If the new leaders make a big deal about banning ‘earmarks’ - which amount to less than 1 percent of federal spending - count it as a feint. If they propose means-testing Medicare or raising the retirement age, count them as serious.”
To deal with an ethical and budgetary morass that outrages the American people, you see, is a waste of time because the pointless spending is a mere 10 or 15 billion bucks. Serious politicians should deal only with gargantuan issues that will personally impact every American’s life.
Such thinking is a trap. First, in a divided Washington, big things are only going to happen after big compromises. That’s not why Tea Party voters sent new Republicans to Washington, but breaking the bond between a new generation of leaders and their Tea Party backers is exactly why Washington old-timers want 2010’s victors to start bending the knee. Once separated from powerful grass-roots support, new Washington leaders will have to fall back on the money and lobbyists of traditional Washington.
Second, the message of the past three elections is simple: The public does not trust any politician or party to rearrange their world or their lives.
The public is sick of big. From America’s longest war to its most expensive nation-building project to its giant new health entitlement launched by Republicans to the Democrats’ thousand-page laws on health care and consumer finance (soon to be followed by millions of pages of regulations), which will mandate how we’re born to how we die while supervising every financial transaction of our lives in between, no one knows how any of this will turn out a decade from now.
Will Iraq be a stable bulwark of democracy or a reinvigorated source of terror? Will the new credit card rules crush consumer credit and hopes for economic recovery, or do they herald the promised golden age of fairness for the little guy? Such vast interventions with such unknowable consequences quite rightly inspire fear as much as hope.
Plenty of people in politics and journalism think they know how such efforts will work out in the long run, but far-too-frequently-burned voters now demand to verify before they trust.
What the Republican wave on its way to Washington needs to do is take a deep breath and start very small. The earmark reform that Slate so disdains is exactly the kind of small step GOP insurgents can take that will build the trust to do something more.
Banning earmarks isn’t arcane, so the public can understand it and opponents cannot sow fear. The decision to kill earmarks is clear and principled, so demands for compromise will fall flat. Overwhelming majorities of both parties want it, so if Democrats use their remaining levers of power to block it, they will pay a price.
String together a series of such steps, and Republicans can turn the opportunity that voters gave them Tuesday night into a mandate to take the bigger steps the nation so desperately needs.
David Mastio is deputy editorial page editor of The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Mastio, former Deputy Editorial Page Editor at The Washington Times, was an editorial writer and op-ed editor for USA Today, Washington correspondent for The Detroit News, editorial writer for The Virginian-Pilot, founding Editorial Page Editor of The Washington Examiner and speechwriter for World Bank President Robert Zoellick when he was the United States Trade Representative under President George W. ...
- MASTIO: Know-nothing scientists
- MASTIO: Forgive us our Tea Parties
- MASTIO: Dead bodies demand organic food moratorium
- MASTIO: NPR's reality deficit
- MASTIO: Urgent new protection for felons' feelings
Latest Blog Entries
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation