SCHOENBERGER: White House fumbled S&P warning

Foolish politicos attack instead of listening and acting

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Stop the presses, folks! You know we’re in campaign season when the White House plays defense and plans a road show any time some person, company or Tea Party member says something publicly about the short-term outlook for - as so fittingly described by Gordon Gekko - the dysfunctional corporation known as the U.S.A.

That’s exactly what happened when a certain ratings company located on the southern tip of Manhattan decided to issue a statement about the scary and uncontrollable deficit and questioned whether the crew in Washington had enough juice to tackle it.

Standard & Poor’s didn’t downgrade the country’s triple-A status, but it did place the country on alert and plan on watching the shenanigans closely to see if our lawmakers and president can somehow come up with a plan pay off $14 trillion in debt without having to sell Maine, Vermont and parts of New York to the Canadians.

But how about the reaction from the Obama administration? Rather than issue a credible plan, it attacked like a bully and made comments about “political motivation” on the part of S&P. Really? Every time I visit the good people at 55 Water St., all they say is how Wall Street is improving in terms of spirit, morale and - most important - employment. That’s not what people say when they are out to embarrass the Obama administration.

Why would they issue a negative statement with obvious political connotations and risk harm to the one sector that is obviously improving? It’s crystal-clear to those in the know that S&P is deeply concerned about the lack of urgent efforts to lower this critically high fiscal risk. So they did what any responsible group would do, realizing the influence such comments would have: They told the White House first.

The White House didn’t respond equally responsibly. Instead, the striking attacks following S&P’s release were more inflammatory than helpful in calming the markets. The Obama administration had more than 48 hours to craft a response, plan media appearances and provide a positive tone rather than the knee-jerk responses from Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers Austan Goolsbee and, my favorite - anonymous senior White House officials.

Had it not been for the Fed’s timely injection of $6 billion, the markets most likely would have extended Monday’s sharp sell-off. Therefore, the White House can do what it does best and just ignore the S&P statement. If anybody like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh or Neil Cavuto brings it up, White House officials can point to the market rally here and abroad and say, “See, S&P is irrelevant and wrong.”

The problem for the Obama administration, however, is that you can’t sweep a $14 trillion headache under the rug. The longer the president, his staff and Capitol Hill politicians wait to come up with a sensible spending plan that benefits the country, the more troubling it’s going to be for those seeking a return in 2012’s markets.

Americans are angry, tired of being pushed around, and want the change we were promised in November 2008. Want to know why Donald Trump is leading the polls by nine points? Because voters know he and the people in his circle are more likely to remove the deficit anchor from our ankles than the guy currently residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Plus, in a perfect Reaganesque way, he doesn’t seem too fond of Washington.

If politicians want a growing country, they need to face the music, listen to S&P and get the job done.

Todd M. Schoenberger is managing director of LandColt Trading.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts