If political parties cannot win over voters, perhaps just trying to confuse them might work.
Delegate Timothy D. Hugo is the latest Republican to enter the fray over Fairfax County Sheriff Stan D. Barry’s participation in a special retirement system county officials say was never intended to be used for elected officials.
Sheriff Barry in 2009 enrolled in the county’s Deferred Retirement Option Program, or DROP, which essentially lets employees who work beyond their normal retirement date to receive some of their benefits in a lump sum instead of earning additional years toward their service. At the end of a three-year period, however, employees are supposed to collect their money and retire.
Republicans have howled that Sheriff Barry’s enrollment is a “blatant abuse” of a system intended for career officials and that he is “fleecing” taxpayers out of about $1 million.
Mr. Hugo, Fairfax Republican, recently announced that he plans to introduce legislation barring elected officials from entering special retirement plans offered by the state and localities.
“He’s the one who signed up for the program,” Mr. Hugo said. “I don’t usually get into things like this, but this one kind of struck me.”
“There’s no issue, so they had to create one,” Sheriff Barry said. “Quite candidly, it’s not just an exaggeration. It’s outright lies. They just keep perpetuating them.”
“I believe an elected official should have the trust and the confidence of the public,” he said. “My campaign for sheriff will continue to work hard to gain the trust of the people of Fairfax County.”
Mark Rozell, a professor of public policy at George Mason University, said that issue might not resonate with voters during the campaign.
“Most people understand that [this is] entirely different from misusing public resources, traveling on the public dime,” Mr. Rozell said. “That’s what really gets voters irate.”
Under Sheriff Barry’s arrangement, signed off on by the county attorney’s office, he wouldn’t collect a lump sum until his term was over, his benefits would not gather interest and he would not accumulate service years for retirement. He has also said he would serve as sheriff even if his salary and benefits were voided after the election.
Mr. Rozell said it would come down to voters understanding the nuances of the issue - an uphill battle, given the nature of the subject.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Eat & drink your way to better health, a better body and a better planet.
Let’s talk about everything, especially the absurdity of it all
Things to do, places to go, new spots to enjoy with friends and family from Norfolk to Washington, D.C., to Delaware and all points inbetween.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall