- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
SIMMONS: How to make our schools a lot better
At a time when school districts like the District’s are considering closing dozens of schools and making sure the cap is tightened on the red-ink bottle, Americans who participated in a report released Thursday by the Fordham Institute have a few curt messages.
Be cautious about labeling students as “special needs,” close or combine schools with declining enrollments, and lay off teachers who don’t excel, they said.
Respondents said far more than that, according to Fordham’s report “How Americans Would Slim Down Public Education,” which looks at how our economic downturn turned the smiles that once represented school systems flush with public dollars upside down.
And sure, the Obama administration continues to toss our money up in the air with programs like Race to the Top and by granting state after state an exemption for failing average yearly progress, a tough-love mandate of the Bush administration’s No Child Left Behind law.
But that’s precisely why the thoughts of the 1,009 Americans in the poll are so interesting.
How’s this for a game changer? Seventy-four percent said teachers with poor performance should be “laid off first and those with excellent performance protected.” Just 18 percent want to have “newcomers laid off first and veteran teachers protected.”
This one reflects a huge support for brick-and-mortar schools. Thirty-two percent view virtual schools as a bad idea, while 40 percent see them as a good option, but only for students who have difficulty in traditional schools.
As for saving money by trimming staff, 69 percent support “reducing the number of district-level administrators to the bare minimum.”
And here’s one that surely interrupts the peaceful grave of the late U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat and the No. 1 advocate for special education funding. Seventy-six percent of respondents believe that “too many students are being mislabeled as having special needs when they just have behavior problems or weren’t taught well in the first place.”
And here’s my favorite because it surely will ruffle feathers from California to Michigan to the nation’s capital. Sixty-three percent support closing or combining schools that have declining enrollments. The same percentage of respondents also said merging small school districts so they share things such as the superintendent’s office, transportation services and clerical help is a good idea.
Proposals to close or merge schools rarely sit well in urban areas.
A few years ago in Pittsburgh, for example, emotions poured out to keep open the doors of long-standing sports powerhouse Schenley High School (whose alumni include former Washington Redskins running back Larry Brown). Schenley’s doors are now shut.
In the District, residents are already raising a ruckus over a worst-case scenario that could see the doors of more than 30 traditional public schools shuttered in the near future.
The goalpost for that possibility was set in a study commissioned by Mayor Vincent C. Gray, but the die was cast more than a decade ago when parents began choosing public charter schools over regular neighborhood schools.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: Pictures of Obama and 'Dane' lady don't lie
- SIMMONS: Mandela: May the man of many roles rest in peace
- SIMMONS: Obama visits Southeast D.C. with minimum wage on his mind
- SIMMONS: Mayor Gray has only himself to outrun in campaign
- SIMMONS: Jack Kent Cooke's legacy continues to produce winners
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Dr. Ben Carson disavows efforts at presidential draft
- STEVENS: Resisting the seduction of housing speculation
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.
John Glaser turns his pen toward foreign policy and international relations around the world
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow