- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
MILLER: Gun control dilemma
Federal ruling threatens concealed carry restrictions in the District and Maryland
Question of the Day
Anti-gun jurisdictions are in trouble. Tuesday’s 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down the Illinois ban on concealed carry has put in the crosshairs the reluctance of the District and Maryland to allow citizens to exercise their right to self-defense outside the home.
Attorney Alan Gura, whom the Second Amendment Foundation hired to argue the Moore v. Madigan case in Illinois, has been distributing Judge Richard A. Posner’s majority decision to other courts currently mulling over the meaning of the right to bear arms. Mr. Gura represents plaintiffs in several firearms cases in the country, including the Palmer v. D.C. in the District and the Woollard v. Sheridan case in Maryland.
The Palmer case was filed in August 2009 and remains pending. “We’ve been waiting a long time for a decision,” said Mr. Gura in an interview with The Washington Times on Thursday. “Whoever loses will take it to appeal, so this is just the first step.”
The 7th Circuit decision puts the District’s attorney general in a legal pickle. The city made a big production out of Moore when the trial court sided with state law. Since Illinois had the same total prohibition on carry as Washington, it will be hard now for D.C. officials to ignore the clear application of the appellate court’s reasoning.
“The city council needs to stop resisting the Constitution,” said Mr. Gura. “The only question is how much of the taxpayers’ money they are going to waste because the end result is going to be that people will have the Second Amendment respected here.” Neither Mayor Vincent Gray nor City Council Chairman Phil Mendelson responded to repeated requests for comment.
Pro-gun activists are paying close attention to how the Illinois state legislature crafts its response to the latest ruling. The question is whether a new law allowing carry rights in the Prairie State will be “shall issue” or “may issue,” which puts the burden on the carry permit applicant to come up with a good reason for needing a handgun. This backdoor approach to gun control might not last long.
Maryland in effect never issues such permits to law-abiding citizens who are just interested in protecting themselves or their family. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to decide the constitutionality of these policies in the Woollard case in the next few months.
“The language of Moore strongly suggested that the ‘may issue’ is not going to fly,” said Mr. Gura. “It said that the right outside the home is just as important as inside.” As Judge Posner wrote, “A Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower.”
The fundamental constitutional right to self-defense is proving too strong for its enemies to destroy. It’s time for politicians in Illinois, Maryland and the District to stop trying to dodge the inevitable. As the rest of the country has done, they should recognize the right of its citizens to bear arms in all reasonable cases.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Michelle Obama has media blackout in China while touting freedom of press
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Steve King
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians