- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Supreme Court’s next move awaited on gay nuptials
Question of the Day
A decision about whether the U.S. Supreme Court will take up a gay-marriage case could come as early as Monday.
The court was scheduled Friday to discuss a California gay-marriage lawsuit, as well as several other cases involving the federal government’s primary marriage law.
The American Foundation for Equal Rights, which sued to overturn California’s Proposition 8, reported that it heard “no action yet” after the Friday conference on the case, known as Hollingsworth v. Perry. Four justices must agree to hear a case before it moves forward.
The high court will post any decisions at 9:30 a.m. Monday.
If there are no decisions about the gay-marriage cases, it means the justices may discuss them at a future conference, including one on Dec. 7.
California supporters of gay marriage are eagerly waiting for a Supreme Court ruling on Hollingsworth, because if it declines to hear the case, then the voter-passed Proposition 8 — which defines marriage in California as the union of one man and one woman — is struck down, and gay marriage will quickly resume in the Golden State.
“Prop. 8 will be gone for good, and marriage equality will be restored in California,” said Adam Umhoefer, executive director of AFER, about that scenario.
Gay marriage was permitted in 2008 for a few months during the time between a California Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage and voters passing Prop. 8 on Election Day.
This year, AFER lawyers Theodore Olson and David Boies asked the Supreme Court not to review the case, because, they said, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals correctly found Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional in a 2-1 ruling. The appellate court “did nothing more than restore to gay people the equal dignity of which Proposition 8 had divested them,” AFER argued, noting on its website that the Supreme Court has already ruled 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right.
Protectmarriage.com, which is asking the Supreme Court to take the case, argued that more than 7 million Californians “of all races, creeds and walks of life” voted for Proposition 8, as they believed the unique relationship between one man and one woman should continue to be the cornerstone of society.
The organization and its co-petitioners, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez and Mark A. Jansson, are asking whether the U.S. Constitution prohibits the people of California from defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman in their state.
If the high court takes the Hollingsworth case, it would likely not render a decision until summer.
If the court rejects the case, state clerks, officials and gay couples are all preparing for marriage, according to California media reports. “It could be an early holiday gift for Californians, especially to Paul Katami and Jeffrey Zarrillo, as well as Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier,” the four plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 trial, according to the San Diego Gay and Lesbian News.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Massachusetts lawmakers OK new abortion clinic buffer law
- Mississippi abortion law can't be enforced
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- Houston mayor: Sorry that police put man's blind dog on road to die
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors