- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
- Russia’s neighbors shiver amid Putin’s Cold War moves in Ukraine
- New SAT: The essay portion is to become optional
- Military group can’t march to honor the fallen at Boston Marathon due to security changes
- Senate passes bills deleting ‘retarded’ from laws
- China announces biggest military hike in 3 years: We are not ‘boy scouts with spears’
Supreme Court’s next move awaited on gay nuptials
A decision about whether the U.S. Supreme Court will take up a gay-marriage case could come as early as Monday.
The American Foundation for Equal Rights, which sued to overturn California’s Proposition 8, reported that it heard “no action yet” after the Friday conference on the case, known as Hollingsworth v. Perry. Four justices must agree to hear a case before it moves forward.
The high court will post any decisions at 9:30 a.m. Monday.
If there are no decisions about the gay-marriage cases, it means the justices may discuss them at a future conference, including one on Dec. 7.
California supporters of gay marriage are eagerly waiting for a Supreme Court ruling on Hollingsworth, because if it declines to hear the case, then the voter-passed Proposition 8 — which defines marriage in California as the union of one man and one woman — is struck down, and gay marriage will quickly resume in the Golden State.
Gay marriage was permitted in 2008 for a few months during the time between a California Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage and voters passing Prop. 8 on Election Day.
This year, AFER lawyers Theodore Olson and David Boies asked the Supreme Court not to review the case, because, they said, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals correctly found Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional in a 2-1 ruling. The appellate court “did nothing more than restore to gay people the equal dignity of which Proposition 8 had divested them,” AFER argued, noting on its website that the Supreme Court has already ruled 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right.
Protectmarriage.com, which is asking the Supreme Court to take the case, argued that more than 7 million Californians “of all races, creeds and walks of life” voted for Proposition 8, as they believed the unique relationship between one man and one woman should continue to be the cornerstone of society.
The organization and its co-petitioners, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez and Mark A. Jansson, are asking whether the U.S. Constitution prohibits the people of California from defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman in their state.
If the high court takes the Hollingsworth case, it would likely not render a decision until summer.
If the court rejects the case, state clerks, officials and gay couples are all preparing for marriage, according to California media reports. “It could be an early holiday gift for Californians, especially to Paul Katami and Jeffrey Zarrillo, as well as Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier,” the four plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 trial, according to the San Diego Gay and Lesbian News.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Public accommodations provision in Md. transgender rights bill draws outcry
- German home-school family can stay in U.S. indefinitely
- U.S. Supreme Court declines German home-school case
- Medical facility 'buffer-zone' law in court
- Relationship video sparks backlash, blames the birth control pill
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Aronofsky's 'Noah' banned in Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Bill Clinton cashes in on nonprofit hospital
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- Back to the Future: HUVr Tech marketing video goes viral with hoverboard release tease
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- Russian lawmaker wants to outlaw U.S. dollar, calls it a Ponzi scheme
- Obama goes from lame to laughable in just one week
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again