- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
- Hillary: ‘dead broke’ comment was ‘inartful,’ but insists it was ‘accurate’
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional
- As fighting in Gaza rages on, Kerry battles hapless bumbler perception
- New Englander Scott Brown turns his gaze to the U.S. border crisis
- Toronto’s Rob Ford takes rehabbed self to kids’ playground for political props
- Sen. Joe Manchin sued by his brother over old loan: report
- New Mexico decides to use HealthCare.gov for 2015
MILLER: A scarlet letter for guns
Prince George’s public registry shows county’s priorities are misdirected
Question of the Day
Lawmakers in Prince George’s County, Md. hate guns so much they want to brand anyone convicted of violating one of the state’s convoluted firearm statutes. Stab someone with a knife, and the county won’t care or take notice of you after you serve your time. Sell a handgun that’s not on the state’s list of approved firearms, and the Washington suburb will mark you as a criminal and hold you up to public ridicule.
Beginning July 27, anyone convicted of a gun offense in the county must register with the chief of police. The person will be required to provide a description of the crime, conviction date, home and work address and other “identifying factors.” The offender is then forced to check in with the registry every six months for at least three years. The county council, which voted unanimously for the ordinance last month, said the purpose was to help the police “track repeat offenders” and “assist in subsequent investigations.”
Maryland’s attorney general ruled in late June that the list must also be made public. A spokesman for Prince George’s County Executive Rushern L. Baker III said they are “working through the process” on how to make it publicly available. County politicians studied neighboring Baltimore city and District of Columbia gun offenders registries when drafting the legislation. The Baltimore list was upended in 2011 when a circuit court ruled that the law creating it was “unconstitutionally vague and overly broad.”
The D.C. city council started its list in 2009 after the Supreme Court forced Washington to end its 30-year handgun ban. The list is supposed to be an internal tool for the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) to monitor offenders, though the police are allowed to share the list with any federal, state or local government agency.
As an example of how ridiculous these registries can be, former Army Specialist Adam Meckler, a veteran of both the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, is branded a convicted criminal on the D.C. list because he absent-mindedly left 14 rounds of 9mm in his bag when he went from his Virginia home to a VFW in the city. He committed no other crime and had no gun with him. Spc. Meckler, who has an otherwise spotless record, said that being photographed and fingerprinted was humiliating and made him feel as if he “was registering as a sex offender.”
The number of people swept up by such lists is considerable. According to an internal MPD database, there have been 1,726 people arrested in D.C. since 2009 for unregistered firearms, which was the top charge for 366 of them. In that same period, there have been 2,258 people charged with unregistered ammunition and 197 of those were the top charge. None of these people would have been arrested or branded a few miles away in Virginia because nothing they did is considered a crime.
Though not as bad as the District, Maryland’s gun laws ignore the meaning of the Second Amendment. A federal judge recently ruled the state’s de facto ban on concealed carry unconstitutional. Instead of finding new ways to stigmatize gun owners, Prince George’s County should focus on balancing its budget by cutting wasteful spending — starting by eliminating this useless registry.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Exclusive - Mark Witaschek takes the stand in D.C. shotgun shell trial
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Rush Limbaugh: 'There is no journalism anymore'
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional