- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
Ballot initiatives likely to confuse Michigan voters
Governor criticizes union efforts
Question of the Day
LANSING, Mich. — In a year of political pushback and unusually sharp partisan fights across the Midwest, union anger at Republicans and general voter frustration may turn Michigan into a case study in ballot-box confusion this November.
As many as 14 ballot initiatives could be put before voters in November, adding to confusion for even the most educated followers of policy and, according to state’s Republican governor, threatening the state’s progress on government reforms after years of tough economic times.
Asked last week at a town-hall event about the state’s ever-growing list of ballot petition drives, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder responded, “Most of them don’t have a whole lot of value.”
“Basically all they’re doing is messing with the Michigan Constitution and trying to go backward, taking us back or making things more complicated or more expensive,” he said.
Among the most prominent initiatives collecting petition signatures are a drive by unions to keep collective bargaining rights as a part of the state constitution, negating a push to make Michigan a right-to-work state; to require utilities to get 25 percent of their energy from renewable sources; and to require a two-thirds vote from the state legislature before taxes can be raised.
Like the governor, the state’s Chamber of Commerce opposes several of these ballot proposals, and it has announced a new coalition of business and taxpayer groups to fight proposals they deem “an unprecedented assault on Michigan’s state constitution.”
“Unfortunately, there are several special interest groups trying to hack their way in and hijack the constitution for their own personal gain and to use it to go around the legislative process, and a lot of our members think we should fight this,” said Jim Holcomb, senior vice president for business advocacy and general counsel of the Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
He calls some efforts, particularly those by public sector unions “a stifling of Michigan’s reinvention” and a bid to protect their privileged position.
“A lot of these government employee unions are saying ‘Oh, no, we need to reach in to taxpayer wallets further.’ We see this across the Midwest,” he said. “These are the battleground states in this year’s election cycle where taxpayers need to step up and fight.”
Thus far, no ballot initiative has been certified by the state’s Board of Canvassers, said Gisgie Gendreau, spokeswoman for Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson.
The collected signature petitions must be approved 60 days before the election in November to appear on the ballot, and there is no telling at this point how many will succeed. The most Michigan voters have seen on a ballot in recent memory is 12 issues in 1978.
Among other efforts making their way to voters include a proposal seeking voter approval to construct a new international trade crossing; a repeal of the state’s emergency manager law, which allows the state to take over an economically failing city; and a measure to create eight new casinos in the state.
Some say the wider use of referendums is the result of an increasingly polarized electorate and a greater willingness to use the populist-era tool to overturn legislators, as seen in the spate of recall elections this year in Wisconsin.
“People are anxious and frustrated and some are furious about the national situation that appears to be anti-union, anti-teacher, and anti a lot of things,” observes Betty Buss of the Citizens Research Council.
“In Michigan, the fact that we have a Republican governor, a Republican legislature and what amounts to be a Republican Supreme Court has added more tensions from unions and from Democrats,” she said. “I think the time is ripe and the ground is fertile now for a lot of different groups who are concerned about a lot of issues to get the state constitution changed to initiate or prevent laws.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Right-to-work proponents demand justice for violence
- Unions vow to fight Michigan right-to-work law
- Indiana's move pushed Michigan on right-to-work
- Michigan’s governor sides with right to work
- Dems look to Obama to punish Michigan over labor vote
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq