- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Redistricting petitioners in Maryland in final push for names
Question of the Day
A petition drive seeking a referendum on Maryland's congressional map faces its final deadline this weekend, and organizers said Thursday they are still scrambling to gather the necessary signatures.
Petitioners have until Saturday night to submit 55,736 valid voter signatures in order to force a November vote on the map, which was drawn by Gov. Martin O'Malley, a Democrat, and approved last year by both houses of the Democrat-dominated General Assembly.
Organizers turned in nearly 27,000 of those signatures on May 31 after two months of work, setting up the tall task of collecting 29,000 more in June — a goal petitioners say they are approaching but still need a late push to reach.
"Right now, we're more concerned with getting signatures than mounting a political campaign," petition chairman Delegate Neil C. Parrott, Washington Republican, said Thursday afternoon. "I am cautiously optimistic, but we have not reached our goal yet."
State law required petition organizers to submit 18,579 signatures by the end of May to keep the drive going. Organizers reported they were short of the needed number on the morning of the required turn-in date, but they ended up submitting 26,763 signatures that night after a day of reaching out to new signers and encouraging previous supporters to seek signatures from friends.
Mr. Parrott declined Thursday to say how many signatures have been collected.
Republicans have led criticism of the map and have been joined by some black Democrats.
The groups argue that the map was drawn unfairly by Democratic leaders to help the party win seven of the state's eight congressional seats and to limit the state to two majority-minority districts.
Critics say a third majority-minority district should have been added to reflect the state's growing black and minority population.
"The map clearly doesn't make any sense," said Tony Campbell, president of Marylanders for Coherent and Fair Representation and former chairman of the Baltimore County Republican Central Committee. "This is more of an educational process, but as we've been able to show the map to people, we've been successful."
The map's defenders insist that it accurately reflects changes in population and makes virtually all of the state's districts more competitive. They also point out that the map has stood up to a legal challenge over its constitutionality, receiving a favorable District Court ruling last year that was upheld this week by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The rules governing congressional redistricting are generally less strict than those for redrawing state legislative maps.
While Maryland's General Assembly districts must be compact and avoid unnecessary crossing of county lines and bodies of water, the primary requirement for the state's congressional districts is that they be equal in population.
Democratic leaders and some political analysts have suggested thatMarylanders have largely moved on from congressional redistricting — which was completed during a special session in October — and that the issue is unlikely to gain nearly as much interest or passionate debate as other ballot initiatives such as same-sex marriage and the Dream Act.
"It's insider baseball for a lot of voters, I think," House Majority Leader Kumar P. Barve, Montgomery Democrat, said recently.
Map supporters have questioned petitioners' logic because if the map goes to referendum and is rejected by voters, the governor and assembly would once again be in charge of drawing a new map in time for the 2014 elections.
While redistricting would be controlled by the same people, Mr. Parrott said he thinks a repeat of the process would put elected officials on notice to draw a fairer map looking toward 2014, an election year in which the governor's office and all legislators' seats will be up for grabs.
"When the voters speak, the governor and leaders of the legislature will be forced to come up with a map that makes sense," he said. "If they don't, it will be at their own peril."
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Hill joined The Washington Times in February 2011 as a Maryland political reporter. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Md. drivers could face eventual doubling of gas tax
- Federal appeals court restores Maryland's concealed carry law
- Md. bill would end student suspensions for mimicking gun behavior
- Maryland Senate passes bill decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana
- Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- KUHNER: Will Russia-Ukraine be Europe's next war?
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq