- Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
- American dream dying, but many see free market as solution: Poll
- Air Force base in South Carolina boots Nativity scene
- Israel poised for a $173M boost from the U.S. for missile defense
- Leon Panetta named as source of ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ scriptwriter’s information
- Mandela service sign language interpreter: ‘He made up his own signs’
- Pope Francis named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’
- Ben Affleck: Fundraising for Democrats started to ‘feel gross’
- Vladimir Putin orders military to boost presence in Arctic
- Brooklyn, N.Y.: ‘Lesbian capital’ of the Northeast
Ryan budget shoots for lower deficit, flatter tax
Senate Democrats say they’ll defend higher spending levels
Rep. Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, presented his colleagues Tuesday a sweeping rewrite of the federal budget that would move toward a flatter income tax and dramatically cut spending, balancing the budget in the long run by holding down the growth of Medicare and shrinking Medicaid.
Mr. Ryan’s plan cancels the deep defense-spending cuts that are looming after last year’s deficit supercommittee failed to reach an agreement, and instead he slashes at other government spending, taking on everything from food stamps to agriculture subsidies to the federal workforce.
Over the next decade, Mr. Ryan’s plan would spend $5.2 trillion less than President Obama’s budget, would tax Americans by $2 trillion less, and lead to a smaller deficit in each year going forward.
But to get there, Mr. Ryan goes beyond the outlines of last year’s hard-fought debt deal, cutting an additional $352 billion out of discretionary spending over the next decade — and he challenged Senate Democrats to join him.
“None of this works if the Senate decides not to budget again,” Mr Ryan said. “The Senate didn’t do a budget in 2010. They didn’t do a budget in 2011. And now they’re saying they’re not going to do a budget again in 2012 at a time when we have the most predictable debt crisis on our horizon.”
At root, the fight is over whether the spending levels in last year’s debt deal, which were labeled “caps,” amount to an upper limit — as the Republican says — or were intended to be exact figures the government must spend, as House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer insisted again Tuesday.
“We made a deal. Nobody, in my opinion, misunderstood that we had made a deal. Not a deal that was a cap. What kind of deal is that?” the Maryland Democrat said. “Everybody understands that you sit around a table, and you try to come to an agreement, and each side gives on what their bottom or top line was, what their line was.”
Mr. Ryan’s budget outlines spending for fiscal year 2013, for the rest of the coming decade, and out over a four-decade horizon.
But the 2013 numbers are the most immediate, since they set guidelines for the spending bills Congress must adopt by Oct. 1, which is the beginning of the fiscal year.
Last year’s debt deal called for discretionary spending to be capped at $1.047 trillion in 2013, but that figure drops to $949 billion when the effects of the failure of last year’s deficit supercommittee are calculated.
Both Democrats and Republicans say discretionary spending should be higher than that level, but they will struggle to reach agreement on a final number.
House Democrats even raised the possibility of a government shutdown, saying the Republican spending cuts will force one to happen.
“Today, the Republican budget resolution reneges on that agreement, upending the FY 2013 appropriations process before it has a chance to begin and setting the stage for another round of government shutdown brinkmanship in the fall,” said Rep. Norman D. Dicks of Washington, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.
In the Senate, Democrats do not plan on passing a full budget. Instead, they argue the debt deal’s numbers constitute a budget, since they set enforceable limits on discretionary spending.
But without a budget, there is little chance Congress would tackle the broader issues of Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlement spending that all sides now agree are the chief drivers of long-term spending growth.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- Wind farms: Interior Department sacrifices eagle protection for alternative energy
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bipartisan House votes against 'patent trolls' who file lawsuits against innovators
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
Latest Blog Entries
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Obama's antics at Nelson Mandela tribute: Jovial conversation, handshake with Raul Castro
- MILLER: Dick Heller challenges D.C.s gun registration, files for summary judgement in Heller II
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- FITTON: A closer look at the Benghazi lie
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
News and views on the Civil War.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow