- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
EDITORIAL: Benghazigate and the secret cable
Another document casts doubt on the administration’s response to terrorism
Question of the Day
The latest twist in the Benghazigate saga is a newly discovered, secret diplomatic cable. The document, sent two weeks before the Sept. 11 murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans, warned that the consulate building in Benghazi could not withstand a “coordinated attack.” It is yet another piece of evidence underscoring the Obama administration’s inability to respond to intelligence.
The White House knew the situation in Benghazi was dangerous and unstable. In the preceding months a series of attacks had taken place against western interests — including against the American consulate itself. Repeated requests for increased security were denied on the basis that the threat wasn’t sufficient to justify it. The new cable reveals there were “approximately ten Islamist militias and [al Qaeda] training camps within Benghazi.” That ought to have served as sufficient proof that heightened security was needed, particularly in advance of the Sept. 11, 2001, anniversary.
Once the crisis broke, the administration failed to step up and do the right thing. Potentially life-saving military assets were not dispatched to relieve the besieged Americans, and ready forces may have been ordered to stand down. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said, “The basic principle here is you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about what’s taking place.” This is a recipe for defeat. Every hot crisis is going to have murky intelligence. The principle in this case is the tradeoff between time and opportunity. The longer decision-makers wait for information, the fewer opportunities they will have to act. In fast-breaking crises, the facts on the ground change rapidly, so waiting virtually guarantees losing the chance to act decisively. Mr. Panetta may grouse that his critics are engaged in Monday morning quarterbacking, but the fact is that our team did not even show up for the game.
It’s still not clear exactly what Mr. Obama was doing or where he was while the attack was under way. The White House had been informed of the attack, and Mr. Obama should have been closely engaged with the unfolding events. Mr. Panetta may have advised the president that “wait and see” was the best course of action, but the final decision rested with the commander in chief. Mr. Obama should have given the order for the available military forces to take whatever action they could to either save the besieged Americans or take out the terrorists while they were still in the vicinity. The buck stops with Mr. Obama, not with the State Department, the CIA or the Pentagon. Mr. Obama has made much of his “gutsy call” to send a SEAL team to kill Osama bin Laden, but Benghazi has proved to be a gutless call.
In tragic situations like this, the American people expect openness and candor from their government; they have received neither. The administration’s shifting stories, uncertain timelines and lack of frankness have generated an atmosphere of distrust. Whether the lack of reliable information is because of confusion, deception or election-year calculation remains to be seen. Nearly two months after the Benghazi incident, we are still waiting for answers. It’s time for the administration to come clean.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Trump-Carson a 2016 dream ticket
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama fundraises as the world burns
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No U.S. support for Christian peril
- EDITORIAL: Gun-shy Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab