- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
MILLER: Obama’s massive tax hike
House Republicans have to stop the president from hurting the economy
Question of the Day
Now that he never has to run for election again, President Obama can show his true colors. Mr. Obama made it clear Wednesday he wants to whack Americans with $1.6 trillion in tax increases so that an obese Uncle Sam won’t have to go on a diet. The only thing that can slow down his sharp turn to the left is the House GOP.
“When it comes to the top 2 percent, what I’m not going to do is to extend further a tax cut for folks who don’t need it, which would cost close to a trillion dollars,” Mr. Obama said Wednesday in his first formal domestic news conference since June.
He insisted his re-election was a mandate for raising taxes on small businesses and investors, which he called his “guiding principle during these negotiations but, more importantly, during the next four years of my administration.” The president also declared that a “modest tax increase” would not “impinge on business investment.”
Rep. Dave Camp, chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, says that’s not true. “Every report we’ve seen — from employers to the Congressional Budget Office — points to job loss if the president’s proposed tax hike is allowed to take effect,” the Michigan Republican told The Washington Times Wednesday. “In this economy, where people are struggling to find work, how can Washington be in the business of destroying any job?”
While Mr. Obama claimed his tax increase would not affect 97 percent of businesses, he neglected to explain those it does hit earn a majority of U.S. small-business profits and thus have the largest impact on the economy. That’s why the accounting firm Ernst & Young reported that raising the top two income tax rates to as high as 39.6 percent would result in a $200 billion drop in output and a loss of 710,000 jobs.
Last week, House Speaker John A. Boehner offered Mr. Obama a compromise in which Republicans would help work for tax reform that closes special-interest loopholes to bring in more revenue in return for serious reform to the entitlement programs that are a major source of our fiscal problems.
To have any hope of winning concessions from the White House, Republicans need to wage a smarter public relations battle. Mr. Obama gets away with calling his plan to raise taxes without doing anything about spending a “balanced approach.” Extending existing tax rates is referred to as a “tax cut,” even though no one’s tax rates will go down.
Democrats are savvier in using “real people” as the face of their policies, rather than the cold statistics Republicans prefer. A Gallup poll Wednesday showed the Democratic tactic has been effective as the number of Americans who are open to deficit reduction that includes tax hikes has gone up from 43 percent in July 2011 to 56 percent today.
The president isn’t going to be beaten in this game unless Republicans adapt. For instance, invite the small-business owners who can’t withstand higher taxes without laying off employees to personally explain their plight before the camera. Now that Mr. Obama is a lame duck, it’s more important than ever that fiscal conservatives make their case in a more media-savvy manner. The future of our economy depends on it.
Emilly Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Michelle Obama has media blackout in China while touting freedom of press
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab