- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
MILLER: Standoff at the ‘fiscal cliff’
Democrats refuse to offer any spending cuts in the deal
Democrats have painted themselves into a box with their Mediscare tactics. Because they spent the last two years frightening seniors with tales of Republicans taking away their benefits and “ending Medicare as we know it,” the left-hand side of the aisle has effectively eliminated the possibility of negotiating changes to this broken program essential to any true resolution of the looming budgetary and tax disaster.
House Speaker John A. Boehner told reporters Thursday that he was disappointed in the progress on “fiscal cliff” negotiations. There have been no substantive talks between congressional leaders and the White House since their first meeting two weeks ago. The Ohio Republican blames the impasse on the other side’s refusal to do anything other than demand tax increases.
“We’ve put real concessions on the line by putting revenues on the table right upfront,” Mr. Boehner explained. “Unfortunately, many Democrats continue to rule out sensible spending cuts that must be part of any significant agreement that will reduce our deficit.” Without a serious discussion of trimming Uncle Sam’s outlays, GOP leaders say no deal is possible.
A few minutes later, on the other side of the Capitol, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid held his own news conference to blame the GOP for not coming forward with an alternative tax-hike plan. He was asked twice about what sort of entitlement reform his caucus might accept. Both times, the Nevada Democrat refused to answer. When questioned about the disconnect with what Mr. Boehner said about the necessity, Mr. Reid merely said, “I don’t understand his brain, so you should ask him.”
The Democratic strategy is to decouple the grand bargain plan so spending cuts necessary for the sequestration wouldn’t be tied to the expiring George W. Bush tax rates. The endgame is to get the Republicans to fold on tax increases before Jan. 1 and ignore all the necessary spending reductions.
Instead of cuts, Mr. Reid is looking to bust the budget with a supplemental bill to send billions to the states affected by Hurricane Sandy. Mr. Reid’s No. 2, Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, openly admitted Wednesday that entitlement reform should not even be on the table during the talks, despite the speaker’s insistence to the contrary.
The reason there is a fiscal-cliff crisis is the nation is $16.3 trillion in debt, with about $10 billion more being borrowed every day. We are about to hit the debt ceiling, the legal limit for the government’s borrowing ability. Meanwhile, half the fiscal cliff requires Congress and the president to come up with reductions of $110 billion by January to pay off part of the borrowing that has been done since the last debt-limit increase.
As the biggest driver of the federal debt, Medicare has to be on the table. It just isn’t possible to cut discretionary outlays or raise taxes high enough to reach anywhere near budgetary balance. Mr. Obama and friends are trying to get out of their jam by ramming through tax increases now and giving the GOP vague promises that they’ll do spending cuts and entitlement reform next year. Republicans have made this mistake in the past. They should know better than to get snookered again.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- Donald Trump says he’s a Tea Party member
- MILLER: CPAC debates Tea Party or moderate for 2016 Republican presidential candidate
- MILLER: Huge majorities on East Coast support national gun registry
- MILLER: NRA to score Senate vote on Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Vivec Murthy
- MILLER: New Jersey bill is outright gun ban on .22-caliber rifles and leads to confiscation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Get Breaking Alerts
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's corrupt Senate house of cards
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's flawed Mideast 'peace' plan
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Foreign policy would distract Obama from social hour
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Hit Putin where it hurts over Ukraine