- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Government OKs Arab-owned company to operate U.S. cargo port
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell’s wife had ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
MILLER: Standoff at the ‘fiscal cliff’
Democrats refuse to offer any spending cuts in the deal
Question of the Day
Democrats have painted themselves into a box with their Mediscare tactics. Because they spent the last two years frightening seniors with tales of Republicans taking away their benefits and “ending Medicare as we know it,” the left-hand side of the aisle has effectively eliminated the possibility of negotiating changes to this broken program essential to any true resolution of the looming budgetary and tax disaster.
House Speaker John A. Boehner told reporters Thursday that he was disappointed in the progress on “fiscal cliff” negotiations. There have been no substantive talks between congressional leaders and the White House since their first meeting two weeks ago. The Ohio Republican blames the impasse on the other side’s refusal to do anything other than demand tax increases.
“We’ve put real concessions on the line by putting revenues on the table right upfront,” Mr. Boehner explained. “Unfortunately, many Democrats continue to rule out sensible spending cuts that must be part of any significant agreement that will reduce our deficit.” Without a serious discussion of trimming Uncle Sam’s outlays, GOP leaders say no deal is possible.
A few minutes later, on the other side of the Capitol, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid held his own news conference to blame the GOP for not coming forward with an alternative tax-hike plan. He was asked twice about what sort of entitlement reform his caucus might accept. Both times, the Nevada Democrat refused to answer. When questioned about the disconnect with what Mr. Boehner said about the necessity, Mr. Reid merely said, “I don’t understand his brain, so you should ask him.”
The Democratic strategy is to decouple the grand bargain plan so spending cuts necessary for the sequestration wouldn’t be tied to the expiring George W. Bush tax rates. The endgame is to get the Republicans to fold on tax increases before Jan. 1 and ignore all the necessary spending reductions.
Instead of cuts, Mr. Reid is looking to bust the budget with a supplemental bill to send billions to the states affected by Hurricane Sandy. Mr. Reid’s No. 2, Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, openly admitted Wednesday that entitlement reform should not even be on the table during the talks, despite the speaker’s insistence to the contrary.
The reason there is a fiscal-cliff crisis is the nation is $16.3 trillion in debt, with about $10 billion more being borrowed every day. We are about to hit the debt ceiling, the legal limit for the government’s borrowing ability. Meanwhile, half the fiscal cliff requires Congress and the president to come up with reductions of $110 billion by January to pay off part of the borrowing that has been done since the last debt-limit increase.
As the biggest driver of the federal debt, Medicare has to be on the table. It just isn’t possible to cut discretionary outlays or raise taxes high enough to reach anywhere near budgetary balance. Mr. Obama and friends are trying to get out of their jam by ramming through tax increases now and giving the GOP vague promises that they’ll do spending cuts and entitlement reform next year. Republicans have made this mistake in the past. They should know better than to get snookered again.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Exclusive - Mark Witaschek takes the stand in D.C. shotgun shell trial
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Undocumented immigrants are proud and loud now with their demands
Get Breaking Alerts
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- PHILLIPS: Once-in-a-century stupidity
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job
- Kerry's credibility questioned as fighting in Gaza rages