- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
Utah officials blocked again on gay marriage ban
Court refuses to stay judge’s ruling on same-sex unions
Question of the Day
A federal judge denied Monday the Utah attorney general’s request for a stay of his ruling allowing same-sex marriages, clearing the path for gay couples to marry in what may be the nation’s most socially conservative state.
U.S. District Court Judge Robert J. Shelby refused to place a hold on his decision despite arguments that the state was unprepared for the sudden ruling and that same-sex couples would be irreparably harmed if it were later overturned.
Utah Assistant Attorney General Philip Lott told the judge that the state plans to appeal the judge’s Friday decision, thus casting “a cloud of uncertainty over the same-sex marriages currently taking place,” according to the Salt Lake Tribune.
“Nobody wins if Utah’s marriage laws are changed back and forth,” said Mr. Lott at the Monday morning hearing in Salt Lake City. “The status quo should remain intact.”
Some county clerks had already begun issuing marriage licenses Friday for gay couples, while others were waiting to see if the judge would stay his ruling in anticipation of an appeal. Many couples raced to tie the knot in fear that the legal window would soon be closed.
The judge said Monday that the state’s arguments were essentially the same as those he rejected last week when he issued an opinion stating that the Utah’s constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Mr. Shelby’s decision Friday came after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the section of the federal Defense of Marriage Act defining marriage as between one man and one woman, but stopped short of striking down all state laws and constitutional restrictions on same-sex unions.
A federal appeals court in Denver rejected two requests by the Utah Attorney General’s office over the weekend for emergency stays.
The Deseret [Utah] News reported that hundreds of couples had lined up Monday morning at the Salt Lake County Clerk’s office to obtain marriage licenses.
Within hours of Mr. Shelby’s ruling Friday, as many as 150 applications for marriage licenses for gay and lesbian couples were issued at the Salt Lake County Clerk’s Office alone. Many couples elected to take their vows on the spot, according to the Deseret News.
In his argument Monday, Mr. Lott noted the irony of a federal court compelling Utah to change its definition of marriage, given that the federal government had once compelled Utah to define marriage as between one man and one woman in order to join the union in 1896.
Those living in the territory that became Utah recognized plural polygamous marriage in keeping with the teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which at the time allowed the practice. The church disavowed polygamy in 1890.
The judge’s ruling Friday makes Utah the 18th state to permit same-sex marriage. On Thursday, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
In Ohio, a federal judge appeared to clear the way for gay marriage by ordering authorities Monday to recognize such marriages on death certificates on the grounds that the state’s ban on same-sex unions is unconstitutional.
“Today, same-sex couples in Utah have renewed hope that they will soon be free to marry, and there is no legal or moral reason for the state to stand in their way,” said Charles Joughin in a statement Friday on the Human Rights Campaign blog.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Plagiarism scandal threatens Senate campaign of Montana Democrat John Walsh
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Act would create tax-free savings accounts for the disabled
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Carson wins straw poll as conservatives focus on winning battle of ideas
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq