- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: ‘Emergency plan’ launched
- Colorado judge strikes voter-backed gay marriage ban, but issues stay
- Brooklyn Bridge flag-swapping suspects identified by nickname
- Christian woman in Sudan spared for apostasy flies to Italy
- Iraq: 60 dead in attack on prisoner convoy
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
Obama admin. easing contraception mandate in health law
But some pro-life groups still unhappy
Question of the Day
The Obama administration on Friday rolled out a revised rule that gives religious institutions the option to divorce themselves from a mandate in the president’s health care law that requires insurance plans to cover contraception for their employees.
The original regulation sparked a political uproar and dozens of lawsuits from religious organizations and private businesses, who said the mandate would force them to violate their religious and moral principles or face legal and financial penalties.
The new proposal from Department of Health and Human Services would allow religious nonprofits such as hospitals and universities that object to the mandate to receive an accommodation that still provides their employees separate contraceptive coverage with no co-pays, “but at no cost to the religious organization.”
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, a deputy director at the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, said that, under the proposed rule, “insurance companies — not churches or other religious organizations — will cover contraceptive services.”
But early reaction to the new rule was mixed, with pro-choice groups hailing the language while those who opposed the original mandate either noncommittal or still unhappy with the new plan.
The Alliance Defending Freedom, a self-described “legal ministry” that is litigating several of the corporate cases, said Mr. Obama’s gesture on Friday fell short.
“All Americans, not just those in church organizations, are guaranteed freedom of conscience in their daily lives and work,” ADF senior counsel Matt Bowman said. “The administration’s narrow gesture does nothing to protect many faith-based employers or religious families from the unconstitutional abortion pill mandate.”
HHS officials envision a system in which insurance issuers or a third-party administrator — depending on whether an employer uses a group health plan or is self-insured— will offer the contraception coverage to enrollees and then see savings through a deduction in the user fees they would normally pay to be part of a state-based insurance exchange as part of Mr. Obama’s law.
Officials said issuers should also recognize savings that come from the health benefits of offering contraception.
No federal funds will be expended under the plan, although ostensibly federal and state governments will be losing out on the fees that would normally paid to participate in the exchanges, officials said. The plan will be open to comments from interested parties through April 8.
“It is important to realize these proposals are just that — proposed — and not final,” Ms. Brooks-LaSure told reporters in a conference call.
But it appeared unlikely that the new rules will placate the dozens of religious nonprofits and corporate owners that have filed lawsuits to protest the mandate contained in Mr. Obama’s sweeping new health care law, which passed in 2010 and was largely upheld by the Supreme Court last June. The plaintiffs say the use of preventive contraception or “morning-after” pills is at odds with their religious beliefs.
Defenders of the modified mandate noted Friday that religious officials and business owners will not have to use the contraceptives or pay to supply them directly to their employees.
Actual houses of worship were already exempt from the contraception mandate. Corporations, however, started to face fines this year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful
- Insurers cough up refunds to subscribers under Obamacare ‘80-20 rule’
- New Democratic caucus will pressure GOP governors to expand Medicaid
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Hezbollah in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- FIELDS: A tale of a boy, a Bible and a gun
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq