- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Lots of buzz about domestic drones; concerns rise with possibilities
Question of the Day
The drone industry isn’t flying under the radar anymore.
As industry leaders, government and military officials gather this week in Northern Virginia, the “unmanned vehicle systems” sector faces mounting questions on all sides, including privacy concerns, hostile state and local laws, and constitutional battles over the roles of drones in the modern U.S. military arsenal.
Even Virginia, the state hosting the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International convention, is considering laws to impose a two-year moratorium on drone use.
With the flurry of activity, lawmakers and the general public are beginning to get a firmer grasp on what drones can do and the greater roles they will play in everyday American life, analysts say.
The conversation about drones is no longer being had solely in Washington, but in town halls across the country, said Amie Stepanovich, an attorney with the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
“The industry has really been controlling these conversations. We’re hoping that won’t continue,” she said Monday. “The industry has definitely taken off in terms of publicity. People are becoming more aware of the industry and how active they are in the U.S.”
Amid all the questions, criticism and proposed laws, this week’s conference in McLean is a chance for the sector to try to turn attention away from the civil-liberties concerns associated with their products and toward the benefits they offer to law enforcement, fire departments and other governmental entities.
“They have the capability to help police and firefighters, who put themselves into harm’s way every day in order to protect the communities they serve, do their job safely and efficiently,” association Chairman Peter Bale said in a recent letter to Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, arguing against the pending anti-drone legislation.
“And in times of tight budgets, [drones] can provide the same capability of a manned helicopter at a fraction of the operational cost, saving taxpayer dollars,” Mr. Bale said.
Law enforcement officials in Florida have made similar arguments against drone legislation introduced by state Sen. Joe Negron, a Republican. While Mr. Negron’s bill includes exemptions — such as allowing drones to be used in hostage situations or to find a missing child — he, like other critics, said there must be tight controls on the drones.
“Drones are fine for killing terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, but they shouldn’t be used to monitor the activities of law-abiding Floridians,” he said last week, according to The Palm Beach Post.
Mr. Negron’s bill is similar to proposals in Montana, Washington and elsewhere, though they differ in scope. Federal lawmakers also are taking aim at drones and their place in American foreign policy.
A number of senators have floated the idea of a “drone assassination court,” a judge or panel of judges that would sign off on U.S. military drone strikes around the globe.
Yet another piece of legislation will be unveiled this week in the House, a bipartisan bill laying out how and for what purposes drones can be used and requiring that all judges and attorneys general provide a detailed list of all drone warrants issued and the legal rationale for granting them. The Preserving American Privacy Act will be introduced by Rep. Ted Poe, Texas Republican, and Rep. Zoe Lofgren, California Democrat, and will include other drone rules and limits.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming
- Boehner presses Obama on 2008 law contributing to border crisis
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq