- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
EDITORIAL: Black boxes turn cars into tattle tools
Government-mandated data recorders could threaten driver privacy
Question of the Day
Cellphones can track our conversations and whereabouts, but they’re not the only devices that have gotten too smart for our own good. Uncle Sam is planning to mandate data recorders as standard equipment in all new vehicles to snoop on the driving habits of the public. Before that happens, legal roadblocks should be put in place to prevent Americans’ personal information from falling into the wrong hands.
Most cars are already equipped with an event-data recorder, a device similar to the “black box” installed in aircraft that reveals what went wrong in a crash. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to force all cars manufactured in the United States after Sept. 1, 2014, to carry one. The period for public comments on the proposed regulation ended Monday.
The cigarette-pack-sized machines can help authorities locate a vehicle in the event of an emergency. They also collect data on speed, steering, braking and seat-belt use — handy information in determining the cause of a fender-bender. Proposed rules say the recorder should store and report data recorded at least 30 seconds prior to an accident. As the devices have become more advanced, however, some have also become more invasive, keeping tabs on occupants’ use of the Internet and radio during driving, for example. While most units are accessed through a plug-in port, more sophisticated models can transmit data wirelessly to an information center, as the OnStar system can do in the event of a crash.
As the volume of data collected by black boxes has risen, questions about who may access it have become increasingly crucial. Transportation officials claim the information will lead to improved vehicle safety, and investigators have an obvious desire for evidence of the cause of road mishaps. Others want to the information for profit, like auto-insurance companies that crave a peek at policyholders’ driving habits so they can raise rates. It’s only a matter of time before some government agency realizes it can bypass the need for pricey speed cameras by having automobiles automatically issue speeding tickets to their own drivers.
Only 13 states have laws protecting vehicle owners from open access to event-data recorder information. Many of those have exceptions that allow access with owner consent or court order, or for repair-shop diagnosis, vehicle-safety research or dispatching of emergency medical personnel. A few states prohibit insurance companies from demanding data before paying a claim.
Most states, however, impose no restrictions that would prevent black boxes from becoming onboard spy devices. That’s why privacy laws need to be updated and reinforced. In January, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Maracich v. Spears, a case contesting the definition of “personal information” that state motor vehicle departments may release under the federal Driver Privacy Protection Act. A ruling that narrows interpretation of the kinds of data that can be made public could spur states to follow suit.
Government’s first instinct is always to overreach, particularly when it comes to matters of privacy. It makes sense to limit the snooping before it becomes a major problem.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Take a first look at The Washington Times' new dynamic website
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: West shouldn't pander to Putin
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: 'Redskins' hardly the only offender
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Radar, torpedos to end Hamas tunnels?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gaza 'analysis' poorly veiled bigotry
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- Houston mayor: Sorry that police put man's blind dog on road to die