- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- South Africans hold day of prayer for Nelson Mandela
- Mandela not on life support in final hours, friend says
- Ukraine protesters topple, decapitate Lenin statue in Kiev
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
Obama faces new pressure on Keystone pipeline
Nebraska governor’s OK was last hurdle
Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman on Tuesday removed the only other remaining hurdle by formally approving the pipeline’s modified 194-mile route through his state, skirting sensitive ecological areas and clearing up the last major question mark on the course of the proposed $7 billion Canada-to-Texas project.
“Construction and operation of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline … would have minimal environmental impacts in Nebraska,” Mr. Heineman, a Republican, said in a letter to Mr. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, detailing how the updated route avoids the state’s most environmentally sensitive areas. The State Department must approve the project because it crosses the border with Canada.
The pipeline would transport oil from Canadian oil sands through the U.S. en route to Gulf Coast refineries, providing a major impetus toward North American energy independence. Nebraska and other states also would see immediate financial dividends; Mr. Heineman cited nearly $420 million in economic benefits just from the pipeline’s construction. Thousands of jobs also would be created, and additional tax revenue would pour into the state each year until at least 2030.
But environmental groups remain vehemently opposed to the project, and they are greatly encouraged by Mr. Obama’s recent pledge to battle climate change, seeing it as a possible sign that he will block the pipeline. Despite heavy pressure from presidential challenger Mitt Romney and other Republicans, Mr. Obama last year effectively put off a decision on Keystone until after the 2012 election.
“We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” the president said during his inaugural address Monday. “The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But American cannot resist this transition. We must lead it.”
The pipeline, critics argue, would contribute significantly to climate change by promoting the use of fossil fuels and producing carbon emissions.
Reducing those emissions is a top priority for the Obama administration and for other world leaders. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon this week said that one of his top goals for the year is to reach a global agreement on climate change.
“The world is now experiencing unprecedented challenges. Climate change is fast happening — much, much faster than one would have expected. Climate and ecosystems are under growing strain,” Mr. Ban told The Associated Press. “I will do my best to mobilize the political will and resources so that the member states [of the U.N.] can agree to a new legally binding global agreement on climate change.”
While the Obama administration surely will find willing partners around the world in the fight against climate change, it faces a harder time closer to home. In fact, congressional Republicans wasted no time Tuesday in pressuring the president to approve the Keystone pipeline immediately.
“Every state along the proposed route supports this project, as does a bipartisan coalition in Congress and a majority of Americans,” House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said in a statement. “I recognize all the political pressure the president faces, but with our energy security at stake and many jobs in limbo, he should find a way to say yes.”
Republican leaders on the House Energy and Commerce Committee promised to “fight tooth and nail for this pipeline” in the coming months.
It’s unclear when Mr. Obama will make a decision on the project, or when the State Department will release its findings. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Tuesday that it is unlikely the department will complete its review before the end of March.
Asked about Nebraska’s decision to endorse a new route, White House spokesman Jay Carney deferred questions to the State Department.
“For now, the State Department has the reins,” he said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama tries to calm Israeli fears over Iranian nuke deal 'not based on trust'
- Obama, first lady will attend Mandela memorial services
- Obama: Nelson Mandela now 'belongs to the ages'
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
- Obama calls on bartenders to help sell health care reform
Latest Blog Entries
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- CHELLANEY: China's game of chicken
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Russian lawmaker wants to outlaw U.S. dollar, calls it a Ponzi scheme
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- New Internet security challenge arises for cybercops
- Wife of Obama aide found dead in burning car in home's garage
- Congress creates a legislative fortress for military sex-assault policy
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
"Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you're thinking in order to make your thinking better." - Dr. Richard Paul
Go beyond tourism's "top 10" bus tour destinations with Susan McKee as she explores the varied history, culture, food, and gardens, of the world.
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!