- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
MILLER: An offer Harry Reid can’t refuse
House GOP offers ‘no budget, no pay’ for short-term debt-ceiling increase
Harry Reid has successfully avoided showing his cards on spending priorities for four years. The Senate majority leader has adamantly refused to bring a budget to the floor in order to leave Republican priorities hanging out as a political pinata to beat up during the campaign. The latest GOP plan, which is up for a vote in the House on Wednesday, will force the Nevada Democrat to lay his cards on the table.
The proposed legislation authorizes the Treasury to borrow as much as it needs through May 18, without any offsetting reductions in spending. In return for that generous concession, the legislation gives the House and Senate a deadline of April 15 to pass a budget. If either chamber fails to do so, paychecks for the delinquent members would be deposited in an escrow account until the lawmakers adopt a joint budget resolution.
House Speaker John A. Boehner announced this plan after meetings with his conference at their retreat last week, telling them, “The principle is simple: no budget, no pay.” President Obama is still refusing to negotiate over the debt ceiling, but the latest plan is getting a warm reception. “The fact that the House Republicans have made this decision is certainly something that we welcome,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney on Tuesday.
The idea of tying member salaries to getting their work done originated from the grass roots. Freshman Rep. Mark Meadows made the idea of “no budget, no pay” a central theme of his campaign.
As the North Carolina Republican explained in an interview with The Washington Times, the salary ultimatum shows the public “we are willing to live by the same rules as hardworking taxpayers.” The current situation, in which the House passes a budget every year without the Senate doing the same, renders negotiations the equivalent of “I’m talking to myself in the mirror,” said Mr. Meadows.
A Rasmussen poll Tuesday found 81 percent of Americans agree that Congress should take a 25 percent pay cut until the budget is balanced, but Mr. Obama wants even higher salaries. On Dec. 27, he signed an executive order granting $11 billion in pay raises to government employees, including Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Cabinet secretaries and members of Congress.
Capitol Hill lawmakers voted to overturn their own pay increase in the debt-ceiling deal at the beginning of the year, and House Republicans plan to vote soon on overturning the rest of the government pay hikes.
There’s reason to be concerned Republicans have surrendered the principle of dollar-for-dollar spending cuts. Many solid conservative members, however, are satisfied the three-month increase in borrowing is worth trading for the chance to stop Mr. Obama from claiming Congress isn’t paying its bills.
“We use the debt ceiling as a vehicle for us to get a budget with meaningful spending cuts, which is our top priority,” explained Mr. Meadows.
The president’s use of seniors and the military as human shields to protect his spending binge has worked, unfortunately. The scare tactics have limited the Republican appetite for temporarily shutting down non-essential government functions to force needed reforms. If the latest idea succeeds in forcing Mr. Reid to agree to a spending blueprint with his House colleagues, the added transparency should help encourage a bit of spending restraint.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Michelle Obama has media blackout in China while touting freedom of press
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Team Obama's bizarre behavior helps Gitmo terrorists foil justice
Get Breaking Alerts
- With pot and e-cigarettes, Big Tobacco is just waiting to inhale emerging markets
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- Skeptics on all sides take aim of John Kerry's tentative deal on Ukraine
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- UNICEF launches 'Mr. Poo' mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Probe Boston teen's medical, custody case
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support a modern-day Tiananmen protest
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: An honorable president would resign
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable