- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
EDITORIAL: Googling you
Privacy no match for official e-searches
Question of the Day
Lawmen want to know what Americans are up to online. The current rules governing access to Internet-activity records for law enforcement purposes are obsolete, often leaving electronic-communications providers with the dicey task of deciding on which information requests to honor. Existing laws protecting e-privacy desperately need an upgrade.
Google released its latest transparency report last Wednesday, charting an unsettling rise in governmental demands for data on customer Internet searches during the second half of 2012. The Mountain View, Calif.-based company reported it received 21,389 requests for information from July through December 2012, up 136 percent since it started compiling figures in 2009. The search giant reported it complied with 88 percent of the requests and refused to cooperate in 12 percent, concluding they were meritless.
Google reported another disturbing trend: 68 percent of the government queries were in the form of subpoenas, which do not require a judge’s authorization. Only 22 percent of the requests were backed by search warrants obtained through a court, confirming the establishment of probable cause, and 10 percent were accompanied by other types of court orders. Cellphone companies customarily do not produce transparency reports, but responding to queries from Capitol Hill, they reported about 1.3 million cumulative law enforcement requests for customer records in 2011.
The trend of constables bypassing an impartial judicial review when conducting investigations is a by-product of a deficiency in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which was written long before the Internet became a popular destination. This 1986 law allows authorities to obtain electronic records that are more than 180 days old without a court warrant. Back before Facebook and the cloud, hard drives were small and extremely expensive, so such records were rarely preserved. Now, however, Americans create trillions of messages and files each year that are stored for long periods on commercial servers, making them enticing targets for investigators.
Google’s report included an understated wake-up call regarding the growing practice of electronic investigations. “We’ve shared figures like this since 2010, because it’s important for people to understand how government actions affect them,” wrote Richard Salgado, legal director for law enforcement and information security.
Privacy advocates point out that badge-holders from local, state and federal agencies are exploiting a legal gray area created by advances in communications technology that lawmakers did not envision in 1986. Today’s youth are growing up in a world where their entire life is preserved in the form of photos, movie clips and messages stored by various Internet companies. Snooping on someone’s full living record ought to require probable cause.
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has reported legislation that updates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act to protect Americans in the 21st century by requiring a warrant before cops can peruse someone’s emails or other online documents. Lawmen are there to protect us from wrongdoers, but a judge ought to be the one weighing the merits of requests for e-records. Privacy is worth preserving.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for some policy 'pars' from golfer-in-chief
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Texas law is making women safer
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Redskins partnership is a win-win
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No taxpayer funds for illegals
- EDITORIAL: The two faces of Mark Warner
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
Get Breaking Alerts
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine