- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
Foreign bids called critical to A123 sale
Lawyers shepherded deal with Chinese firm
Question of the Day
The prospect of Massachusetts-based high-tech battery-maker A123 Systems landing in the hands of a Chinese competitor has angered some lawmakers, but a group of highly paid lawyers — including a former Senate staffer who earned more than $1,000 per-hour — kept the sale from falling apart amid mounting criticism on Capitol Hill.
By law, officials with the Treasury Department led Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) — which approved the $257 million deal this week — aren’t allowed to discuss their decisions on approving such sales.
But new billing records submitted in A123’s bankruptcy case offer a window into a process that is typically shielded from public view.
The federal government’s approval of the A123 deal came about only after “extensive discussion and negotiation” with a little-known but powerful panel charged with reviewing the sale, lawyers involved in the talks said in recent court papers.
In addition, the U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls conducted a parallel national security review of the proposed A123 sale to Wanxiang America Corp., the Chicago arm of China’s biggest auto parts manufacturer, according to records.
Lawyers from the Skadden Arps law firm, which served as special counsel in the A123 bankruptcy case, disclosed the reviews in legal bills that the firm submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware this week.
A123 went bankrupt last year despite receiving about half of the nearly quarter billion grant it won from the Obama administration to operate factories in Michigan. While a bankruptcy judge approved Wanxiang’s winning bid for most of A123’s assets, the deal still required approval from the federal government. Wanxiang announced it had been cleared to move ahead with the sale this week, but several Republicans weren’t happy.
“Technology produced by A123 and funded by U.S. taxpayers should not simply be shipped off to China so that the military applications for these materials can be reproduced abroad,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, said Tuesday, reacting to news that the federal government had approved the sale.
The Department of Energy, which awarded the federal grant money to A123, declined to comment on the sale. But a spokesman said the federal grant paid for “brick and mortar” construction of advanced battery manufacturing facilities in Michigan.
In its fee application to the bankruptcy court, the law firm said its lawyers helped A123 identify its “most sensitive assets and business operations,” structuring the sale to Wanxiang in a way that would address concerns of both government panels reviewing the sale.
“This structuring process involved extensive input from and negotiations with” both with the Treasury-led CFIUS and the State Department directorate.
In explaining its bill, which totaled about $300,000, the firm said foreign bids for A123 were “critically important” to the company’s efforts to maximize its value and that, indeed, the highest bid for most of the company’s assets came from the subsidiary of Wanxiang.
Two partners from the firm worked on the case, along with other lawyers, associates and staff, with rates ranging from $310 per hour to $1,090 per hour for partner Ivan A. Schlager, a former Senate staffer.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Jim McElhatton is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- EPA official sentenced for bizarre 'spy' ruse
- Independent counsel eyed in Fast and Furious
- House seeks Fast and Furious gun-walking documents
- Details emerge on bureaucrat who pretended to be CIA operative
- Stung by defeat: SEC hires trial consultants
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Nobody likes to talk about dying. But we can help.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow